Hecklers and the Art of Improvised Timing in Stand-Up Comedy Or, How to Slay a Disruption Without Losing the Room There exists a comfortably worn axiom in comedy that “timing is everything.” Rarely questioned, often quoted. But within the lived (and often loudly interrupted) reality of stand-up, this axiom is less a truism and more a battleground. Because timing, in the strictest structuralist sense, presupposes control — and in live performance, control is a negotiation. Consider the heckler: an uninvited participant in the collaborative performance contract. They do not operate within the expected bounds of comedic tradition — they rupture it. Their interjection constitutes a spontaneous reframing of the comedic artefact in progress. In the terms laid out in my poetics framework ( The Comedic Multiform , 2023 ), the heckler introduces a dissonant variable at the frame level — momentarily shifting the audience’s alignment, the performer’s authority, and the perceived rhythm o...
Posts
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
🎤 Dissecting the Punchline: The Case for a Structuralist Framework in Stand-Up Comedy The Frog on the Board 🐸 “Humour can be dissected, as a frog can,” wrote E.B. White, “but the thing dies in the process.” It’s a line frequently trotted out whenever someone dares to take comedy seriously—as if the only dignified response to a joke is a laugh, and never a footnote. But what if the point isn’t to preserve the frog? What if the goal is to understand why it jumps the way it does—and how some frogs leap clean across a room while others barely make the lily pad? In comedy studies, stand-up has often been treated like that frog: alive, sure, but too slippery, too chaotic, too... culturally mucky to warrant real critical attention. Analyses tend to focus on the joke itself (see the General Theory of Verbal Humour by Attardo & Raskin), or the performer’s politics (see Lockyer & Pickering’s Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour ), or Sophie Quirk’s study in Why Stand-Up Matters ...